Annual Wellness Visits for Police and Public Safety Officers: What Clinicians Are Actually Doing — and Where the Gaps Are

Annual Wellness Visits for Police and Public Safety Officers: What Clinicians Are Actually Doing — and Where the Gaps Are

Do annual wellness visits for police and public safety officers actually work? A 2024 survey of 87 clinicians conducting these visits suggests that while the practice is growing — and in some states legally mandated — there is significant variation in how visits are structured, what gets reported back to agencies, and whether the format genuinely protects officers or creates new risks.

TL;DR

  • Annual wellness visits for officers are expanding rapidly, but clinicians conducting them lack standardized guidance on testing, record keeping, and confidentiality boundaries.
  • What gets reported back to the agency — and how — remains one of the most unresolved and consequential questions in this space.
  • Visits framed as evaluative rather than wellness-oriented risk reinforcing the exact stigma they aim to reduce.
  • EMS and fire agencies watching this model should pay close attention to what law enforcement is learning the hard way about implementation.

Public safety agencies across the country are rolling out annual mental health wellness visits for sworn personnel. Some states now mandate them. The concept is straightforward: once a year, officers sit down with a mental health professional — not because something went wrong, but as a baseline check-in. On paper, this is a meaningful step. In practice, the implementation is uneven, the boundaries are unclear, and the research is just now catching up to the policy. A 2024 study published in the Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology surveyed 87 clinicians who conduct these visits. What emerged is a first real look at how these programs operate — and where they break down. For anyone working in fire or EMS, this matters. The same model is being discussed, adapted, and in some cases adopted for broader public safety populations. Understanding what law enforcement is learning now can shape how these programs are built — or avoided — in other first responder disciplines.

What the 2024 Clinician Survey Found

Researchers Nancy Ryba Panza, Jennifer Kelly, and William Walsh surveyed mental health professionals currently providing annual wellness visits to police and public safety officers. The findings cover content, procedures, outcomes, and regulatory questions. Several areas showed consistency. Most clinicians reported covering topics like stress management, coping strategies, and general mental health screening. Most agreed the visits should be non-evaluative — meaning the purpose is wellness support, not fitness-for-duty determination. But significant variation emerged in three areas:

  • Testing. Some clinicians use standardized psychological instruments during visits. Others avoid them entirely. There is no consensus on whether formal testing helps or hinders the visit's purpose.
  • Information reported to agencies. What clinicians tell the department after a visit varies widely. Some provide only confirmation of attendance. Others share summaries or recommendations. This is where officer trust either holds or collapses.
  • Record keeping. Clinicians reported different practices around documentation — what gets recorded, where it's stored, and who has access. Legal requirements vary by state, and the study found limited clarity even among experienced practitioners. The study also noted disagreement about what to call the service. Terminology matters because the name shapes how officers perceive the visit. "Wellness check" carries different weight than "psychological screening." One signals support. The other signals evaluation.

Where the System Breaks Down

The core tension in annual wellness visits is structural. The clinician is typically contracted or employed by the agency. The officer knows this. Every interaction carries an implicit question: is this conversation confidential, or does it go in a file? When that question is unresolved — or worse, when the answer depends on which clinician or department is involved — trust erodes. Officers show up, say the right things, and leave. The visit becomes a checkbox. The mental health benefit disappears. The COPS Office has emphasized that for these visits to work, they must be confidential, non-evaluative, and focused solely on wellness and education. That guidance is clear. But as the 2024 survey demonstrates, what happens in practice often departs from what guidance recommends. This is not a clinician problem. This is a system design problem. When agencies build wellness programs without standardized protocols for confidentiality, reporting, and scope, they create ambiguity. Ambiguity in mental health contexts produces avoidance.

How Does This Apply Beyond Law Enforcement?

Fire and EMS agencies are watching this model closely. Some departments have already adopted annual wellness visits or are considering them. The appeal is obvious — a proactive, low-barrier way to connect personnel with mental health resources before a crisis. But the lessons from law enforcement apply directly:

  • Confidentiality must be absolute and clearly communicated. If providers cannot guarantee that visit content stays between clinician and officer, participation will be performative. This holds whether the uniform is blue, red, or white.
  • The visit must not function as a fitness-for-duty evaluation. These are separate processes with separate legal frameworks. Combining them — even informally — contaminates both.
  • Terminology shapes participation. Across EMS systems, the language used to describe mental health support directly affects willingness to engage. "Mandatory psych screening" and "annual wellness check-in" describe the same calendar event but produce different responses. C
  • linician selection matters. The 2024 survey found that clinicians providing wellness visits often also provide other psychological services within the same department. Whether the same clinician should conduct wellness visits and fitness-for-duty evaluations remains an open question — and one with real consequences for trust.

What Effective Implementation Looks Like in Practice

A department announces annual wellness visits. Officers receive a scheduling email. The clinician is someone they may or may not have met. The visit lasts 30 to 60 minutes. Afterward, the department receives confirmation of attendance. Nothing else. In departments where this model works, officers report that having a recurring relationship with a provider — even briefly, once a year — lowers the barrier to reaching out when something does go wrong. The visit itself may not be where healing happens. It is where the door opens. In departments where the model fails, the breakdown is almost always in one of three areas: the officer does not trust the confidentiality guarantee, the visit feels evaluative rather than supportive, or the clinician lacks familiarity with public safety culture and operational realities.

Key Considerations for Agencies Exploring This Model

  1. Establish written confidentiality protocols before the first visit. Officers should receive documentation — not just verbal assurance — about what is and is not shared with the agency.
  2. Separate wellness visits from evaluative processes. Different clinicians, different documentation systems, different reporting structures. Operationally, these must not overlap.
  3. Standardize what gets reported. Attendance confirmation only. No summaries. No recommendations. No aggregate data that could identify individuals.
  4. Select clinicians with public safety experience. Cultural competence in this context means understanding operational stress, shift work, exposure patterns, and organizational dynamics — not just clinical credentials.
  5. Name the program carefully. Survey the workforce. Let personnel weigh in on terminology. Small language decisions carry outsized weight in stigma-heavy environments.
  6. Build in follow-up pathways. A wellness visit that identifies a need but offers no accessible next step creates frustration, not support. Resources must exist on the other side of the door.

Follow-up pathways are underestimated. The visit creates awareness. But awareness without accessible, confidential follow-up resources produces a gap — and gaps in mental health support systems tend to widen over time.

Bottom Line

Agencies considering annual wellness visits should design the full system — confidentiality protocols, clinician standards, reporting boundaries, and follow-up pathways — before scheduling the first appointment.

References

Back to blog